Like the pictures you see up top and in my gallery? Want to have your soul devoured by art in a relatively fun way? Well shoot me an e-mail.



Recent Entries

Garion born; thinking of doing video logs - 2012-09-01

I'm married, I'm a prospective father, wow I never update - 2012-05-22

Got the job at the NIA; mother complicates wedding plans - 2011-10-13

Scrawl - 2011-08-05

It's never been better - 2011-06-02


<<Autobiography>> <<Cast List>> <<Photography>> <<Donations>>

"The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda"

2003-04-10 - 9:55 p.m.

Noam Chomsky is a professor at MIT, who became famous for his ideas regarding the basis of language acquisition in humans. Using this clout, Chomsky has written several books reaching out into other socially-driven fields, such as political science. One such book is "The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda". Since my own opinion means nothing--since I have no clout in my society--I will quote a distinguished man's opinion from this book. If you want the quote's context, read the first paragraph. If you want the balls of the quote, read the second and third ones.

.

.

"(In 1937) there was a major strike, the Steel strike in western Pennsylvania at Johnstown. Business tried out a new techinque of labor destruction, which worked very well. Not through goon squads and breaking knees...but through the more subtle and effective means of propaganda. The idea was to figure out ways to turn the public against the strikers, to present the strikers as disruptive, harmful to the public and against the common interests. The common interesting are those of "us," the businessman, the worker, the housewife. That's all "us." We want to be together and have things like harmony and Americanism and working together. Then there's those bad strikers out there who are disruptive and causing trouble and breaking harmony and violating Americanism. We've got to stop them so we can all live together.

That was essentially the message. A huge amount of effort was put into presenting it. This is, after all, the business community (who is doing this), so they control the media and have massive resources. And it worked, very effectively. It was later called the "Mohawk Valley formula" and applied over and over again to break strikes...by mobilizing community opinion in favor of vapid, empty concepts like Americanism. Who can be against that? Or harmony. Who can be against that? Or, as in the Persian Gulf War, "Support our troops." Who can be against that? Or yellow ribbons. Who can be against that? Anything that's totally vacuous.

In fact, what does it mean if somebody asks you, Do you support the people in Iowa? Can you say, Yes, I support them, or No, I don't support them? It's not even a question. It doesn't mean anything. That's the point. The point of public relations slogans like "support our troops" is that they don't mean anything. They mean as much as whether you support the people in Iowa. Of course, there was an issue. The issue was, Do you support our policy? But you don't want people to think about that issue. That's the whole point of good propaganda...Its crucial value is that it diverts your attention from a question that does mean something: Do you support our policy?"

.

.

Seem familiar?

previous - next

Guestbook

Written and photographic content, 2001-2070, Gemini Inc., All rights reserved. Disclaimer.